recipenanax.blogg.se

1. #2019 best ad blocker for firefox manual
2. #2019 best ad blocker for firefox software
3. #2019 best ad blocker for firefox code
4. #2019 best ad blocker for firefox mac

#2019 best ad blocker for firefox software

There is no evidence that Gorhill did anything in particular to trigger this and there certainly is evidence that there was nothing malcious in the update- its open-source software and all edits have been published!

#2019 best ad blocker for firefox code

Github lists the actual code that was changed between the previous developer version and the rejected developer version. Hill comes across as disingenious and, in any event, makes reference in some places to facts not in evidence, and in other places is simply factually inaccurate based on publicly available documents. he wants to evolve?Īnyway, now that I know more about Hill, I may stop using the extension altogether or until Google gives him permission to list the extension with the changes in the Google extensions listing. Question never asked or answered: “Why is Hill changing the extension in the first place?” Because. The following is a perfect example of propaganda on Hill’s part, a technique used to gain user support that will attempt to annihilate Google for such a REJECTION 3) Hill’s reluctance or inability to change the extension’s code to something that isn’t prohibited let’s users know important information about his character and his ethical code. Google makes the above statement, and Raymond Hill would know EXACTLY what he changed in coding that is considered “prohibited bundling.” Honestly, Google only reveals to all users that the Development version contained code that is considered, perhaps, a way to collect user data or some such privacy violation. “Google stated that the extension violated one of the Chrome Store’s policies that prohibits the bundling of unrelated functionality in extensions.” Since we haven’t read the email from Google to the developer or his reply or any further correspondence in either direction, we really can’t make any sort of assessment or prediction because each side has a “perception” of the situation that only favors one side. For example, does the hosts file interact differently with Firefox on the three platforms it runs on? (Linux, Mac, Windows.) But just repeating what other people have said, without actually experimenting with it, is not helpful. So on my Mac, at least… Firefox’s DoH clearly does _not_ disable my hosts file.Īny further insight into this would be welcome.

My setup requires custom “virtual server” entries in Apache’s main configuration file (nf) as well as a bunch of custom entries in my hosts file.Īnd the local Apache server _does_ work I use it every day.

#2019 best ad blocker for firefox mac

(Not the Apache included with the Mac I installed another one separately.) It took me quite a lot of time to figure out, but I learned a lot of interesting things in the process.

#2019 best ad blocker for firefox manual

How I know this isn’t even related to blocking anything: when I set up my local web-development server (Apache), for multiple websites that I work on, I used a somewhat unusual manual technique. (That’s in addition to having 1.1.1.1 as my preferred DNS provider at the MacOS system level.)īut I also have a custom hosts file, and I know for a fact it IS working. In Firefox Preferences, under Network Settings, I have “Enable DNS over HTTPS” checked, along with the default in the popup menu, “Use Provider / Cloudflare (Default)”. People have said this here before, but is it really true? Maybe on Windows… even there can somebody confirm this? Because on my Mac it’s _not_ true. “Hosts, yes….but not if you switch to DoH.